Ever since they were cast out of the
Garden of Eden, mankind has been seeking a return to a self-sustaining utopian
society based on peace, harmony and communal living. Perhaps at no time in
history was this more evident than during the 19th century when
hundreds of such societies littered the nation’s landscape, most disappearing
within a few years without a trace.
Often led by charismatic leaders
with high religious or secular moral ideals, these settlements experimented
wildly with different models of government, marriage, labor and wealth. Unfortunately,
paradise in the present has always been elusive but that hasn’t stopped people
from trying. Seekers attempting to leave behind the conventions and restrictions
of traditional society have created self-sustaining communities ranging from groups
of tofu-making hippies in rural Virginia to expatriates living in treehouses in
the Costa Rican rainforest.
So why have they failed? For one thing, the bar is constantly being
raised. Life in a modest American home today would have been the envy of the
Middle Ages. It seems that humans are
not able to maintain a moral, financial or educational equality. People will always want more, or someone else’s
toys. Competition is a core human
quality of “survival of the fittest.” Any land of milk and honey automatically
attracts swords and muskets.
Secondly, although acceptance into
these societies is often carefully controlled and outsiders are not welcome, internal
power grabs are even more poisonous to utopian dreams than external threats.
Utopian leadership based on the model of the “benevolent prince” or “philosopher
king” is inherently unstable. There are inevitably factions out of power who
are unhappy with things. Charismatic leaders typically do not provide successors
with anything like their talents. The competition for succession invariably
favors not the wise, but the ruthless.
Finally, ideals are constraints, and
the more constraints one tries to impose, the less viable the community will
be. Since most religious utopias imposed constraints on the members’ worldly
desires, they needed a mechanism for self-selection and, thus, exclusion of
non-believers. Over time, however, these constraints become weakened through
changes in leadership and outside influences and the lines between the society
and the outside world become blurred. In
the end, each member must choose his own way.
In my new book, The Stone House
Legacy, I will explore this phenomenon in more detail. I will look at the
failure of one such settlement through the lens of modern day society. Are we
doomed to continue to make the same mistakes in our search for paradise? In
James Madison’s view, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment